)
Understanding Market Based vs Location Based Emissions
)
Corporate carbon accounting has evolved significantly, with market based vs location based emissions methodologies becoming fundamental to accurate greenhouse gas reporting. These two approaches represent distinct methods for calculating Scope 2 emissions from purchased electricity, each serving different stakeholder needs whilst maintaining transparency in sustainability reporting. Companies increasingly face regulatory pressure to implement dual reporting frameworks that capture both perspectives on their energy consumption and carbon footprint.
The distinction between these methods reflects the complex nature of modern electricity markets, where renewable energy certificates and power purchase agreements can significantly influence reported emissions. Location-based calculations provide standardised benchmarks using grid emission factors, whilst market-based approaches account for specific energy purchasing decisions and contractual instruments. Understanding both methodologies is essential for companies seeking to demonstrate genuine environmental progress whilst meeting evolving compliance requirements.
Understanding the Two Methods: Technical Foundations and Calculations
Location-Based Method: Grid Average Approach
The location-based method calculates emissions using average emission intensity factors for the local electricity grid where consumption occurs. This approach provides consistent, comparable metrics across organisations operating in the same geographic region, regardless of specific energy contracts or renewable energy purchases.
Companies multiply their total electricity consumption by the relevant grid emission factor. For example, using the UK's national grid factor of 0.21233 kg COâ‚‚e/kWh, an organisation consuming 100,000 kWh would report 21.23 tonnes COâ‚‚e. This standardised approach enables benchmarking and supports policy analysis by reflecting actual grid conditions and generation mix.
Market-Based Method: Contractual Instruments Focus
Market-based calculations reflect the emission intensity of electricity that companies have purposefully chosen through renewable energy certificates, power purchase agreements, or supplier-specific contracts. This method rewards strategic purchasing decisions and can demonstrate zero emissions when organisations purchase 100% renewable energy through certified mechanisms.
Without renewable energy contracts, companies must use residual mix factors, which often exceed location-based emissions because they exclude renewable generation already claimed by other parties. The market-based approach incentivises investment in clean energy whilst providing transparency about actual purchasing behaviour and its environmental impact.
Implementation Challenges and Data Quality Solutions
Data Collection and Verification Challenges
Implementing dual reporting presents significant data management complexities. Companies must gather information from multiple sources including utility bills, renewable energy certificate registries, and contractual documentation. Market-based calculations require verification of certificate authenticity, temporal matching between generation and consumption, and proper application of residual mix factors.
Technology Solutions and Best Practices
Advanced carbon accounting platforms now automate data collection and validation processes, integrating with enterprise systems to streamline dual reporting. These solutions incorporate artificial intelligence to detect anomalies, suggest appropriate emission factors, and maintain comprehensive audit trails. Iceberg Data Lab's scientific methodologies and robust databases support organisations globally in achieving accurate, verifiable emissions reporting.
Strategic Business Impact and Iceberg Data Lab Solutions
The choice between methodologies significantly impacts business strategy and ESG performance metrics. Companies investing in renewable energy can demonstrate substantial market-based emissions reductions whilst maintaining transparency through location-based reporting. This dual perspective supports stakeholder communication and regulatory compliance across multiple jurisdictions.
Iceberg Data Lab's comprehensive ESG data solutions enable companies worldwide to navigate these complexities through scientifically-backed methodologies and advanced analytics tools. Our global expertise supports accurate implementation of GHG Protocol requirements whilst providing actionable insights for strategic decision-making. Get in touch to discover how our solutions can help your organisation achieve robust, credible emissions reporting that drives genuine environmental impact.
)
)
)
)
)
Related Articles
You might be interested in these articles
Decarbonization
Decarbonization is now essential for global business, with net zero commitments covering 92% of global GDP. Achieving these targets requires sophisticated data analytics to track emissions reductions accurately. Key technologies driving this transformation include renewable energy, carbon capture, and hydrogen applications. Iceberg Data Lab’s advanced ESG solutions support companies in tracking their decarbonization journey, ensuring alignment with science-based targets, and managing risks across industries from heavy manufacturing to transportation. Our platform provides the analytics and insights necessary for businesses to navigate the path to net zero while maintaining competitive advantage.
Read more →
Eudr
The EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), effective December 30, 2025, mandates that key commodities—including cattle, cocoa, coffee, palm oil, rubber, soy, and wood—entering EU markets are deforestation-free. Companies and financial institutions must implement rigorous due diligence, including geolocation data, risk assessments, and supply chain monitoring. Non-compliance can result in penalties up to 4% of EU turnover. Advanced ESG data platforms, integrating satellite monitoring, AI analytics, and blockchain traceability, enable organisations to manage EUDR risks, ensure compliance, and maintain market access while supporting sustainable investment decisions.
Read more →
Sfdr Pai
The EU’s Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) requires financial institutions to disclose Principal Adverse Impact (PAI) indicators, assessing the negative environmental, social, and governance (ESG) effects of investments. This regulatory framework ensures transparency, accountability, and informed decision-making, requiring comprehensive data on emissions, biodiversity, and social metrics. Advanced data platforms streamline PAI reporting and compliance, helping institutions integrate ESG factors into investment strategies and maintain regulatory alignment.
Read more →
Corporate Sustainability
Corporate sustainability has shifted from a peripheral concern to a strategic imperative that drives long-term value, resilience, and stakeholder trust. Modern organisations integrate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations into core operations, guided by materiality assessments and science-based targets, while embedding sustainability metrics into governance and executive oversight. Technology plays a pivotal role, with AI, machine learning, IoT, and blockchain enabling precise monitoring of energy, water, waste, and supply chain performance, supporting real-time ESG reporting and optimisation. Sustainability initiatives deliver tangible financial benefits through cost reductions, operational efficiency, and resource optimisation, while also enhancing market positioning by meeting consumer demand for responsible products and enabling access to green finance. Transparent stakeholder engagement and adherence to reporting standards like GRI and ISSB strengthen credibility and ensure accountability. By aligning corporate strategy with social and environmental impact, companies create shared value, mitigate risks, and achieve sustainable growth in an interconnected global economy.
Read more →
Maritime Decarbonisation
The maritime industry, responsible for roughly 3% of global greenhouse gas emissions, faces urgent pressure to achieve maritime decarbonisation, with targets of 20% reduction by 2030 and 70% by 2040. Transitioning from fossil fuels, which power 98.8% of vessels, requires advanced ESG data analytics to guide fuel selection, technology adoption, and regulatory compliance. Alternative fuels such as green hydrogen and ammonia offer long-term zero-carbon potential, while LNG and biofuels serve as transitional solutions. Efficiency technologies, including wind-assisted propulsion and advanced hull designs, further reduce fuel consumption. Regulatory frameworks like IMO targets, the EU Emissions Trading System, and FuelEU Maritime mandate emissions tracking and well-to-wake lifecycle assessments, necessitating sophisticated data management systems. Annual investments of $8–90 billion will support this transformation, with data-driven insights enabling shipping companies, investors, and cargo owners to make informed decisions on fuels, technology, and operational strategies, ensuring decarbonisation aligns with both environmental and commercial objectives.
Read more →
Carbon Neutral vs Net Zero
Understanding the difference between carbon neutral and net zero approaches is essential for organizations pursuing credible climate action. Carbon neutrality balances emissions through offsets, primarily covering Scope 1 and 2 emissions, and allows companies to maintain current emission levels while compensating via carbon credits. In contrast, net zero requires a 90%+ reduction across all greenhouse gases, including Scope 3 value chain emissions, before using offsets, demanding fundamental operational transformation and long-term decarbonization. Implementing either framework relies on robust ESG data systems: carbon neutrality needs accurate emissions tracking and offset verification, while net zero requires comprehensive analytics, science-based target setting, and supply chain monitoring. Market trends increasingly favor net zero due to regulatory pressures, investor expectations, and scrutiny over offset quality, making advanced data-driven measurement and verification critical for organizations to demonstrate authentic environmental impact and strategic climate leadership.
Read more →
Understanding Market Based vs Location Based Emissions
Corporate carbon accounting relies on two key methods for reporting Scope 2 emissions: location-based and market-based approaches. The location-based method calculates emissions using average grid emission factors, providing consistent benchmarks across geographic regions regardless of energy purchasing choices. In contrast, the market-based method reflects emissions tied to specific energy contracts, such as renewable energy certificates or power purchase agreements, rewarding companies for intentional low-carbon electricity sourcing. Implementing dual reporting can be complex, requiring accurate data from utility bills, certificate registries, and contracts, along with verification of renewable energy claims. Advanced carbon accounting platforms, like those offered by Iceberg Data Lab, automate data collection, validate emission factors, and maintain audit trails, enabling organisations to report transparently, comply with regulations, and strategically demonstrate progress in reducing carbon footprints.
Read more →
EU Social Taxonomy
The EU Social Taxonomy provides a standardized framework for identifying socially sustainable economic activities across Europe, complementing environmental sustainability initiatives. It focuses on three core social objectives: decent work for workers and value-chain participants, adequate living standards for end-users, and inclusive, resilient communities. Built on globally recognized human rights and labor standards, the taxonomy enables investors and financial institutions to direct capital toward activities that create meaningful social impact while ensuring regulatory compliance and financial performance. By integrating these criteria into investment and corporate decision-making, the EU Social Taxonomy supports transparent social sustainability assessment, reduces risks of social washing, and fosters improved social outcomes across stakeholders, including employees, consumers, and communities.
Read more →
ESRS : European Sustainability Reporting Standards
The European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), developed under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), provide a comprehensive framework for structured, comparable, and decision-useful sustainability reporting across Europe. ESRS aim to align financial and non-financial disclosures, ensuring transparency, stakeholder confidence, and robust ESG data for investors, regulators, and civil society. The standards cover environmental, social, and governance topics, incorporating the principle of double materiality, which requires companies to report both their impact on the world and how sustainability factors affect their financial performance. ESRS consist of general and topical standards, guiding companies on materiality assessments, disclosure requirements, and integration of ESG factors into corporate governance and strategy. Designed for interoperability with global frameworks like ISSB and GRI, ESRS support multinational compliance while providing high-quality sustainability information. Implementation requires structured processes, reliable data management, and cross-department collaboration, enabling companies to produce credible, auditable sustainability reports that strengthen accountability and inform long-term strategic decisions.
Read more →
CSR Trends
CSR Trends highlight how corporate social responsibility has shifted from voluntary philanthropy to a strategic business imperative. Modern CSR in the UK integrates ESG reporting, stakeholder capitalism, ethical supply chain practices, and technology-driven transparency into core business strategy. Employee engagement and activism drive authentic social impact, while companies increasingly measure outcomes across environmental, social, and governance dimensions. These trends enable organisations to enhance brand reputation, attract talent, and achieve sustainable growth. Iceberg Data Lab’s ESG data solutions support businesses in tracking, measuring, and optimising CSR initiatives through advanced analytics and scientific methodologies.
Read more →Get in touch!
Want to know more? Fill out the form or reach us directly via email at contact@icebergdatalab.com.
75009 Paris
EC2Y 9DT London
60327 Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt
Beverly, MA 01915
